Pages

google analytics

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

What I’m Reading: Pontius Pilate



The novel Pontius Pilate[i] by historian Paul L. Maier defies genre.  It’s not quite historical fiction,
though it has both history and fiction.  It’s not biography.  It’s not hagiography.  It’s not a textbook. But it has something of all of these.  Maier describes it in his brief preface as a “documented historical novel.” 

Pontius Pilate, the most (in)famous Roman prefect of Judea, has been the inspiration for countless stories and legends through the centuries, but Maier – writing as an historian – attempted to ground his tale firmly in documented historical fact.  And, for the most part, he has succeeded in writing a compelling and believable account of Pilate.

I greatly appreciated his description of the internal politicking that influenced Pilate’s career.  His appearance within the canonical gospels comes really without context. What Maier provides is an accounting for the pressures and demands faced by this Roman governor.  The gossipy backbiting of rivals, the cynical machinations of political maneuverings, the paranoia and fear of living under vengeful and insane emperors – these tensions come only slightly into view in the gospels, but would have powerfully influenced Pilate and his decision making.

But Pilate dealt not only these Roman anxieties, but also his numerous collisions with the Jewish people.  Time and again his failure to understand Jewish sympathies (and the Jewish manipulation of his failure to understand) led to conflicts – sometimes bloody and violent conflict.

Maier’s novel does an admirable job of putting all of this into historical context, and makes an inviting novel of it all.  But (and there’s always a ‘but’, right?)  the book has a couple of flaws.

First – Maier describes the political situation of Galilee during those first years of the first century A.D. as positively boiling over with zealots and revolutionaries.  This description, as I understand, has fallen out of favor with historians somewhat.  Those years in Galilee, while experiencing a revival of Jewish identity and religious fervor, were relatively peaceful.  And the zealots, as an armed and active force, didn’t really exist until shortly before the Jewish revolt against Rome.  

But even so, the story doesn’t fall apart on this point. 

My other (very minor) complaint is that this book stumbles in its viewpoint.  Most of the book is told, appropriately enough, from Pilate’s vantage. The problem, however, is putting Pilate at the center of all those important events of the gospels (for Maier’s real intent is to show Pilate in relation to Jesus…) when he wasn’t there to witness them. 

Maier does this most of the time by having another eyewitness relate to Pilate what happened.  For example, the centurion Cornelius (yes, that one…) is dispatched to report on Jesus’ activities, Pilate’s wife tells him of her encounter with Jesus and his followers at the temple… But this solution is a weak one.  Good writers show what happened, not tell… These second hand reports to Pilate begin to sound like cliff-note summaries of the stories in the Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles.

Maier’s other solution to this problem is to switch viewpoints. On a few occasions the story jumps Caiaphas or a few of the other characters.  But these jumps occur relatively late in the book – after firmly establishing the story from Pilate’s point of view.  The jumps disrupt the narrative; if it’s Pilate’s story the story should stay with Pilate.

Also in this same complaint is the unevenness of the viewpoint.  While it is pretty much given as Pilates, many of the dates are given from the readers’ point of view – for example, “late in the summer of A.D. 28 Pilate took Procula on the sixty mile trip to Jerusalem…”[ii] and “The year 31 A.D. dawned auspiciously for the prefect of Judea…”[iii]  It would have been historically more accurate and narratively more cohesive to give the dates Ab urbe condita.  

Despite these minor complaints, the novel is enjoyable and educational.


[i]  Maier, Paul L. Pontius Pilate, Doubleday & Company, Inc, Garden City, NY. 1968.
[ii]  Pg. 93
[iii]  Pg. 146

No comments:

Post a Comment

Jeff Carter's books on Goodreads
Muted Hosannas Muted Hosannas
reviews: 2
ratings: 3 (avg rating 4.33)

Related Posts with Thumbnails